Top 10 Eurasian Sociopaths of the 20th Century


stalin-mao In myriad ways, living and working outside your own country helps you see things you never would at home. I teach American Government and American Foreign Policy at PNU, and the questions I get asked are frequently astonishingly naive or extremely creative. On the naive side, students frequently ask me about CIA plots to run the the Middle East or tell me about the JFK conspiracy. On the insightful side, they frequently bristle at the self-justifying language of US foreign policy. When I tell my American students about American exceptionalism, they love it. US students swoon when they learn that John Winthorp called the US ‘the city on the hill,’ or Abraham Lincoln said we were ‘the last, best hope for mankind.’ At best, I get some smirks and sheepishness about how purple and immodest US self-justifying rhetoric can be. (Read W’s second inaugural for your most recent, ‘God-has-a-special-mission-for-America’ hyperbole infusion.) So my average American student carries the US belief in the righteousness of US power acting in the world. Foreigners, on the other hand, go ballistic when you talk like this. When I explain how Americans talk about their own foreign policy, they laugh, smile, and roll their eyes. To them, American exceptionalism smacks of arrogance, imperialism, hubris, etc.

On of my favorite moments is teaching Eurasians about the US view of Eurasia as a sinkhole of US power and the spawning ground of world-breaking fanaticisms that ultimately Americans are tasked to destroy. Eurasians are generally convinced of their cultural superiority to Americans, so they are pretty shocked when they hear that US foreign policy sees the Old World as the land of the Kaiser, Stalin, bin Laden, etc. Whether living in Germany or Korea, one trope I have heard again and again in the 6 years I have lived in Eurasia is how young the US is, how primitive and shallow we are, how we have no culture, no deep traditions, watch too much TV, can’t write poetry, etc. This is old news though; any US expat has heard this for years. And there is some truth to it. The US has no author who has scaled the heights of Tolstoy, Dante, or Shakespeare. We have no architecture to rival the Forbidden Palace or Saint Peter’s. American philosophy, until recently, was a pale reflection of the long, rich traditions of, say, Germany or Confucianism.

But turn-around is always fun, and Eurasians are stunned when I tell them how dysfunctional Americans find their politics. If Eurasia is the font of world culture, it is also the breeding ground for the world’s most bloodthirsty ideologies and ideologues. Hah! That is always good for a laugh, as my non-American students look up in amazement.

The US view of Eurasia is that we should stay out of its entangling alliances, but unfortunately, we get pulled in when Eurasia’s pathologies attack us (the Lusitania, Pearl Harbor, 9/11). Put another way, if Eurasians want to kill each other in huge wars, the US attitude is ‘fine, it’s not our show, we’ll sit it out and get more powerful as you destroy yourselves.’ But since the 20th C, Eurasia’s psychotics have a growing taste for attacking the US. So increasingly the US attitude toward Eurasia is a paternalistic one: they can’t run their own house without slaughtering each other over religion, ideology, territory, etc., so we must order their affairs for them. If we don’t stay in Europe and Asia, eventually their paranoias (communism, fascism, Islamism, etc.) will metastasize and attack the US. When my foreign students tell me the US is arrogant, I tell them to try to see the world the way the US does. The long American foreign policy tradition toward Eurasia is isolationism and offshore balancing– stay out of its wars; intervene only if one power is on the cusp of controlling all of Eurasia (Nazi Germany, USSR). But now, the wars are brought to us, so we feel we must intervene.

My Eurasian students have never even thought this way, so I like to provide a list of the various ideological sociopaths Eurasia has given the world – just in the 20th Century.

 Top Ten: Lenin, Stalin, Hitler, Tojo & the Japanese WWII military junta, Mao, Kim Il Sung, Pol Pot, Kim Jong Il, Ayatollah Khomeini, bin Laden.

B-List: Kaiser William II, Czar Nicholas II, Mussolini, Franco, Sukarno, Tito, the Saudi clerical establishment, Zia ul Haq, Hoxha, Brezhnev, Ceausescu, Erich Honecker,the Shah of Iran, Suharto, Ho Chi Minh, Hafez al Assad, Yasir Arafat, Saddam Hussein, Milosevic, the absolutist megalomaniacs running the Central Asian ‘Stans’ in the 1990s, Mullah Omar

Runners-Up:  Park Chun-hee, Syngman Rhee, Marcos, A.O. Salazar, G. Papadopoulos, Chang Kai-shek, Indira Gandhi

That is a pretty grim list of the worst of the worst. Who else would you add ? (It can’t be a henchman like Beria or Himmler.)

11 thoughts on “Top 10 Eurasian Sociopaths of the 20th Century

  1. Hi,
    Was Lincoln or Jefferson who said “last, best hope of mankind”?
    Enjoyoed reading about how ur students respond.
    Best,
    JFK

  2. Stop bullshitting, Bob. Looks like your patriotic juices are flowing again. Or is it your current batch of Eurasian (lets just say Korean) students is just plain stupid.

    Anyone with a sense of history knows that bloodthirtiness and political dysfunction are not exclusive Eurasian traits. What were you doing with your black population until (at least) 1960’s while singing the paeans for equality and freedom for all; and what was up with your “founding fathers” shtupping black women left and right? Oy, what were you up to with the natives here? Oy, lets not forget how the sociopaths in your civilian intelligence agency were experimenting on your own people.

    US has been able to preach mainly because it has been out of reach geographically and nobody really bothered to look under the shiny packaging. US like any other nation with influence and resources seeks to retain/extend its influence and promote its own brand of ideology (not to be confused with idle ideals) through opportunistic actions. Isolationism kicks in as soon as the opportunitic actions come and bite back.
    Of course, opportunistic actions can and regularly go against the stated ideals, ideologies etc. Let me ask you, what was the Eurasian dysfunction that US was trying to fix in Iran in 1953?

    Last best hope for mankind – oh yeah? US can kiss my brown hairy arse. Oh wait, China is soon going to be teaching how Tai-Chi is the last best hope for mankind’s well-being.

    • You can’t honestly believe that the US ever kicked up anyone as bad as, say, Pol Pot? Your evidence of US misbehavior is Iran in 1953 or slavery – compared to Stalin, Hitler or Mao?! Come on. You don’t believe that.

  3. That’s some fairy tale version of history you are teaching in your university. When is the last time that the US wasn’t involved in a war both overt and covert? Which is the only country in the world to have actually committed the war crime of dropping nuclear bombs on cities for all your worry about Iran? Which country was born out of the death of millions of it’s indigenous inhabitants? And most recently which is the country which came close to destroying the global economy thanks to the sociopathic greed of the few. Not to mention the ongoing undermining of the scientific concensus of AGW again for purely selfish purposes. Which has the largest gap between the haves and the have nots in the western world, the worst healthcare for it’s citizens and the largest number of it’s own citizens in prison in the world.

  4. Pingback: Can Walter Russell Mead Walk the US Right Back from Torture? « Asian Security & US Politics Blog

  5. Pingback: In Light of the Libyan Civil War, Give Mubarak his Due… « Asian Security Blog

  6. Pingback: In Light of the Libyan Civil War, Give Mubarak his Due… « Asian Security Blog

  7. Pingback: Competing Maps of Eurasia: Mackinder vs Barnett & the US Asian ‘Shift’ « Asian Security Blog

  8. Pingback: Retrenchment & Liberal Internationalism don’t really Fit Together (2): R2P | Asian Security Blog

  9. I have to respond to “The US has no author who has scaled the heights of Tolstoy, Dante, or Shakespeare”. It’s just rubbish! Evidence: William Faulkner (and arguably others). All for modesty, but I hate new world cultural inferiority complexes (I come from the country that arguably does it best – Australia).

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s