“Against Dogmatic Bourgeois Flunkeyism,” or what I learned in NK (1)


North Korea 2012 382

My North Korean visa

In August, I visited North Korea for the first time. It was the most unique travelling experience I’ve ever had. I’d certainly recommend it to political scientists and Asia experts, but it wasn’t anything close to a ‘vacation’ or break or anything like that. (Yes, some of the sites marketing tours of NK actually call it that.)

At a bookstore devoted to the works of Kim Il Sung and Kim Jong Il, I stumbled across an essay, from the latter if I remember correctly, about social scientists’ commitment to the revolution and juche. It included the title line – that we must avoid ‘flunkeyism’ toward ‘bourgeois’ forms. We are supposed to contribute to revolution, not critique too much, and not ‘ape’ western ideas.

(I love that sort of over-the-top Marxist writing – I remember the first time I read Maoists decrying ‘capitalist roaders’ and their ‘imperialist running dogs.’ I couldn’t even figure out wth that meant until I got to college. Who doesn’t miss the Cold War? But wait – perhaps Kim Jong Il is wired into the ‘poverty of social science theory’ debate and knows about the flunkeyism endemic to grad school?! A-hah! He knows! He is the great leader! He sees all!)

So here some thoughts that presumably demonstrate my flunkeyist failings:

1. It really is Kim-land

There is an endless debate over the ‘real’ nature of NK – is it a gangster state? A neo-Confucian kingdom? A typical stalinist half of a country divided by the Cold War? Semi-fascist? Presumably the answer is some mix of all that, but what really struck me in-country was the personality cult. Back in April Kim Jong Un referred to NK as “Kim Il Sung nation,” and that is certainly what they showed us. The Kims, especially KIS, were all over the place – statues, placards, and their names on one institution after another.

One defining moment came as I was catching up to our guide, and I walked past a large stadium in Pyongyang. Forgetting where I was for a moment, I asked what it was called, only to be told it was Kim Il Sung Stadium. By this time, after a week in-country, one of my friends in the group looked at me like I had a hole in my head. Of course, it’s KIS stadium – my juche spirit was flagging momentarily.

So if had to answer the ‘what is NK really’ question, I would say a royalist, absolutist cult. It felt like France before the revolution, when whether or not Louis XIV clipped his fingernails that morning was a more important political moment than whether or not peasants were starving somewhere. From all the statues and placards, as well as the relentless Kim-focused presentations by all of our guides – without exception – the dominant ideology was the personal awesomeness and perfection of the two preceding Kims. KIS as something like Jesus Christ seemed far more important that Marxism, juche, and the rest of it.

North Korea 2012 251

Two examples really stick out. At a bowling alley, the ball and pins which KIS bowled on the facility’s opening were kept under glass at the entrance, surrounded by flowers, with photos and a dedicatory statement from KIS inscribed on the wall. At a museum dedicated to the construction of the Pyongyang metro, the entire presentation was focused on KIS’ on-the-spot guidance of the construction, not the metro itself. The museum should have been called the “KIS Visits the Metro” museum. A steel cup from which KIS had drunk while visiting the construction had been retained under glass (insert juche holy grail reference here), as well as the subway seat on which he sat on its opening (it had been cut out of the car to seal under glass). Huge pictures throughout showed KIS smiling and pointing, and the guide made a point to tell us how the subway ran better because of his guidance. That guidance included installing ventilation and flood control, because I guess NK engineers thought a flooded, unventilated subway system would be a great success. Good thing KIS was around to point out such subtle improvements. After seeing so many places where the Kims sat or stood or pointed, I asked semi-seriously if we would eventually visit the KIS bench museum.

I could go on like this for pages, but in short, wherever possible, the magnificence of the Kims, especially KIS , was emphasized. Busts, statues, murals, and slogans were everywhere. “Long live the great Korean leader comrade KIS!” was the standard. All this was far more emphasized than ideology, the revolution, juche, Marxism, the party, songun, even unification. At the Juche tower, several dedicatory plaques just gave up and referred to “Kim Il Sungism,” which dispensing of the fatiguing ideological posturing I found strangely refreshing. At the Juche section of the ‘Three Revolutions Museum,” we learned that Kim Il Sung wrote 18,300 books (that figure is even inscribed on the wall in a huge plaque). What can you even say at point? To me it all looked a lot like evangelical Christianity’s intense focus on the person of Jesus, except in the language of a political-stalinist personality cult. A good book on religion in Korea even makes this argument about the North. Deification doesn’t strike me as particularly Confucian, Korean, or Marxist. KIS’s mother was a Christian, so perhaps that is where it came from.

North Korea 2012 279

Now there’s some flunkeyism for you.

Continued in Part 2.

About these ads

35 thoughts on ““Against Dogmatic Bourgeois Flunkeyism,” or what I learned in NK (1)

    • It most definitely is. But to be fair, I think they were taking us there for a break. That said, it was pretty creepy how ideology even manages to penetrate everyday entertainment. Thanks for reading.

  1. That’s funny to some extent. And the situation in NK reminds me of the Great Cultural Revolution in China. Although i haven’t been in that period for a moment, but we Chinese students have learnt a lot since primary school. So, it is familiar to us, but also unacceptable and dread. I heard from my teacher who study in NK that NK is going to have a revolution in 2012, like what happened in China in 1980s. Well, maybe it will come true one day~ But it is still too difficult to imagine that kind of revolution, right?

    • I thought that too. I thought NK might be like China during the Cultural Revolution.

      I do think big internal changes in NK are unlikely. If NK changes too much, i.e., becomes a lot less communist like China has, then these changes raise the hard question why NK exists at all. So I think too much change is probably not going to happen.

      • Actually i don’t really understand what you mean by “why NK exists at all”. Do you mean that if so, the ROK will reunify the korean peninsula? And the NK exists because of its communist? But, what about mainland China and Taiwan? I believe that there are much in common between this two issues. I do think that the PRC have changed a lot, especially in economy, but the politics in PRC is still so communist and undemocratic. And Taiwan, it has had much more successful revolution in economy as well as politics.To some extent, maybe we can say that Taiwan is superior to mainland China. But it can not reunify China.

        • I mean that NK has no raison d’etre distinct from SK if it simply looks like a poorer version of SK. If NK becomes non-communist, like China has, then there’s no reason for it to exist as a separate Korean state. It should just give up and join its richer twin. This is was what East Germany did.

  2. Pingback: “Of course the Americans Started the War,” or what I learned in NK (2) | Robert Kelly — Asian Security Blog

  3. Pingback: “Kim Jong Il was Born on Mt. Paekdu,” or what I learned in NK (3) | Robert Kelly — Asian Security Blog

  4. Pingback: “Kim Il Sung will always be with Us,” or what I learned in NK (4) | Robert Kelly — Asian Security Blog

  5. Pingback: Pyongyang isn’t ‘Laid-Back & Leafy’; or What Parag Khanna didn’t Learn in NK (5) | Robert Kelly — Asian Security Blog

  6. Pingback: Korean Gender Reader | The Grand Narrative

  7. Pingback: IB Online (5/9): eine kleine Netzschau « Bretterblog

  8. Pingback: Welcome to Lenin Disney: North Korea’s otherworldly tourism experience

  9. Pingback: North Korea as ‘Kim-Land’: My Op-Ed on NK in the JoongAng Daily | Robert Kelly — Asian Security Blog

  10. Pingback: North Korea as ‘Kim-Land’: My Op-Ed on NK in the JoongAng Daily | Robert Kelly — Asian Security Blog

  11. Pingback: 5 Good Things about Korea you should be Thankful for this Thanksgiving | Robert Kelly — Asian Security Blog

  12. Pingback: My Comments to BBC TV about yesterday’s North Korean Nuclear Test | Robert Kelly — Asian Security Blog

  13. Pingback: ‘Rodman-gate’: Can ‘Useful Idiots’ please Stop Shilling for North Korea? | Robert Kelly — Asian Security Blog

  14. Pingback: ‘Rodman-gate’: Can ‘Useful Idiots’ please Stop Shilling for North Korea? » Duck of Minerva

  15. Pingback: Guest Post – Is the Media Coverage of the North Korea Crisis Inflammatory? | Robert Kelly — Asian Security Blog

  16. Pingback: The Awful State of US Punditry on the North Korea Crisis: Bill Richardson called Kim Il Sung ‘Kim Yun Sum,’ or something like that, on CNN Yesterday | Robert Kelly — Asian Security Blog

  17. Pingback: The Awful State of US Punditry on the North Korea Crisis: Bill Richardson called Kim Il Sung ‘Kim Yun Sum,’ or something like that, on CNN Yesterday » Duck of Minerva

  18. Pingback: NK Recap: “North Korea is the Boy Who Cried Wolf – There will be No War” | Robert Kelly — Asian Security Blog

  19. Pingback: NKorea Recap (2): NK is an ‘Upper Volta with Nukes’, so Ignore Them | Robert Kelly — Asian Security Blog

  20. Pingback: North Korea is an ‘Upper Volta with Missiles’ who Cried Wolf Too Often » Duck of Minerva

  21. Pingback: My Diplomat on Essay on Xi’s Trip to Korea: SK as a Hole in the Pivot in Exchange for Help w/ NK | Robert Kelly — Asian Security Blog

  22. Pingback: My Lowy Debate on whether US should Retrench from South Korea, part 1: Yes | Robert Kelly — Asian Security Blog

  23. Pingback: Here's What It Takes To Visit Iran, North Korea, And Iraq | الحرب الطائفية في المملكة

  24. Pingback: Here's What It Takes To Visit Iran, North Korea, And Iraq | NOFrack.co

  25. Pingback: Here’s What It Takes To Visit Iran, North Korea, And Iraq | TryToTravel

  26. Pingback: Here's What It Takes To Visit Iran, North Korea, And Iraq | Business Insider

  27. Pingback: Here’s What It Takes To Visit Iran, North Korea, And Iraq | Trip-adviser.net

  28. Pingback: Here’s What It Takes To Visit Iran, North Korea, And Iraq | Cheapest Hotels Booking

  29. Pingback: Here’s What It Takes To Visit Iran, North Korea, And Iraq | Advise-Trip.com

  30. Pingback: My Submission on Dodko to the University of Nottingham’s Blog Symposium on Asian Territorial Disputes | Robert Kelly — Asian Security Blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s